The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has accused Tesla of falsely advertising its Autopilot and full self-driving (FSD) features, as previously reported Los Angeles Times (via CNBC). The agency filed two separate complaints with the state’s Administrative Hearing Office on July 28, in which Tesla made “false or misleading” claims about the autonomous driving capabilities of its vehicles.
In the filing, the DMV claims the names of Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD features, as well as the language the company uses to describe them, incorrectly imply that cars equipped with the technology can operate autonomously. Huh. The DMV specifically points to information on Tesla’s Autopilot page, which states that its FSD system is “to be able to perform short and long distance trips without any action required by the person sitting in the driver’s seat.” designed” and “capable of navigating urban roads”. , complex intersections and freeways. ,
“Vehicles equipped with those ADAS features may not have been there at the time of those commercials, and may no longer operate as autonomous vehicles.”
Tesla has included Autopilot in all its vehicles, which come with features like traffic-aware cruise control and Autosteer. Drivers have to pay an additional $12,000 for Tesla’s FSD system, an option that adds auto-parking, auto lane changing, the ability for drivers to call a vehicle from the parking space, and access to a beta program for testing . Upcoming Features. Tesla’s FSD and Autopilot don’t make vehicles fully autonomous, and yet require drivers to pay attention to the road and keep their hands at the wheel at all times.
“Rather than simply identifying product or brand names, these ‘Autopilot’ and ‘Full Self-Driving Capability’ labels and descriptions indicate that vehicles equipped with ADAS [advanced driver-assistance system] The features will operate as an autonomous vehicle, but vehicles equipped with those ADAS features could not, at the time of those ads, and now, cannot operate as autonomous vehicles,” the DMV claims in the filling. “These ads are a deceptive practice.”
Although Tesla already provides a disclaimer about its driver-assistance technology, the DMV says that’s not enough to reverse its supposedly misleading statements. The DMV’s action could result in the suspension of Tesla’s license to produce and sell cars in California, but the agency may not go that far. in a statement to Los Angeles Times, a spokesman for the agency said Tesla will need to properly educate customers about its Autopilot and FSD features and provide adequate warnings about the technology’s limitations. Tesla has 15 days to respond to the DMV’s complaint, otherwise the agency will act without a hearing.
Tesla has faced similar complaints in the past, with the German government asking the company to stop using the term “autopilot” in 2016, over concerns that it might suggest that its vehicles are fully autonomous. Huh. Last August, Senators Ed Markey (D-MA) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) asked the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate the way Tesla advertised its Autopilot and FSD systems, claiming that The automaker “exaggerates the capabilities of its vehicles, which “could pose a danger to motorists and other road users.”
In June, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released its first report detailing accidents involving vehicles with advanced driver-assistance systems and autonomous technology. It found that Tesla reported the most accidents related to driver-assistance technology, with 273 from July 20, 2021 to May 21, 2022, accounting for the majority of the total 392 crashes. Tesla is also under investigation by NHTSA for more than a dozen accidents involving Tesla cars with Autopilot and parked emergency vehicles. NHTSA is also investigating a fatal accident in which a Tesla driver using Autopilot collided with and killed a motorcyclist, an incident that is one of 39 ongoing investigations involving Tesla vehicles.